Invasion of Venezuela: A psychological operation and an imminent threat
Internet
Published at: 26/09/2025 06:24 PM
In Venezuela, since
President Hugo Chávez won the presidential elections in 1999, the United States
has worked steadily to destabilize the Bolivarian process and
force a change of government that responds to its interests. That intention is still
in force; therefore, they persist in a permanent attack, both warlike
and psychological.
This interventionist policy that the United States has
maintained against our country began with the coup d'etat in
April 2002, the oil coup of 2002-2003, attempts at destabilization
with the help of Venezuelan opponents or the guarimbas of 2014 and 2017, which left more than 200 people dead and institutions burned or destroyed.
Then in 2015, the then US
president, Barack Obama signed a decree
declaring Venezuela “an unusual and extraordinary threat to the
security of the United States”; then, in August 2018, he financed the assassination attempt
against President Nicolás Maduro.
Later, in 2019, based on the Obama decree, Donald Trump, during his first administration, issued a series of executive orders, including the prohibition of American companies from buying Venezuelan oil. It even applied sanctions to non-American companies that traded with the Venezuelan State, which reduced the country's income from 55 billion dollars to only 500 million and affected all sectors of the economy.
In the same vein, in May
2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Venezuelan government frustrated the
so-called Operation Gideon, when a group of mercenaries led
by a group of former green berets, members of the special forces of the US forces, sought to assassinate President
Nicolás Maduro and other Chavista officials.
We can also recall the attacks and
sabotage against power generation stations, carried out by
mercenaries or groups linked to the extreme right financed by the United States, which occurred in 2006, 2009, 2012, 2021 and 2022.
However, the US maintains intervention strategies such as the use of foundations and Non-Governmental Organizations (
NGOs) funded by the National Foundation for
Democracy (NED) and the United States Agency for
International Development (USAID) to channel destabilization actions within communities.
Currently, in this context of
the United States' relationship with Latin America and the Caribbean, North American
interests in Venezuela and the geopolitical situation, there
has been a chain of statements that began on August 7 of this year. The US
Attorney General, Pamela Bondi, announced that “the
Department of Justice and the Department of State announced a
historic reward of 50 million dollars for information leading to the arrest of
Nicolás Maduro,” whom she accused of being the world's largest drug trafficker,
leading the Cartel of the Suns and having links to a criminal organization
extinct called El Tren de Aragua, without any evidence to support such an
accusation.
The next day, the
news portal The New York Times reported that
US President Donald Trump signed an executive order for the US Armed
Forces to combat drug cartels, even
in the territory of other countries.
Following statements by Secretary
of State Marco Rubio, White House spokeswoman Karoline
Leavitt, prosecutor Bondi and some legislators, on
August 14 the media began to spread information that Washington
was sending 4,000 marines, three warships and a nuclear submarine to the sea Caribbean,
organized by the Southern Command to combat drug trafficking groups.
The development of situations,
such as the bombing of Venezuelan rockers, set off alarm bells throughout the region.
The president of Mexico, Claudia Sheinbaum, and the
president of Colombia, Gustavo Petro, quickly rejected
any type of military action against Venezuela.
Immediately, the
member countries of the Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America - Peoples' Trade
Agreement (ALBA-TCP) denounced
North American actions and called for strengthening the 2014 declaration of the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC) declaring Latin America and the Caribbean as a zone
of peace.
In Venezuela, the people
demonstrated in defense of their sovereignty, their government and peace. They also
declared their support for the president, the Bolivarian National Armed Forces
(FANB) and the members of the National Assembly (AN). President Maduro
called for the formation of workers' and peasant militias in defense of the country's sovereignty.
The statements made by Juan Eduardo Romero, national deputy
of the
United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV) to the news portal PIA-Global, make sense when
he said: “Everything seems to be a cognitive war operation. The attempt to
ensure that factors within the Armed Forces or Venezuelan society
attempt some move to bring about a change of government.”
Romero also noted that
“they activated all defense mechanisms: the reinforcement of security, territorial displacement,
popular mobilization and popular militias
, and he assured that free peoples overcome powerful empires.”
It's all a farce, it's about oil
According to the Oilprice.com portal,
the global benchmark for energy price measurement,
oil price analysis, alternative energy, the largest consumer of oil in the world is the United
States, with 19 million barrels a day.
The world knows that the country with the
largest proven oil reserves is Venezuela, with 303.8
billion barrels, well above Saudi Arabia and Iran,
as stated on the Bloomberg Online portal. Also,
geo-strategically, due to a matter of distance, the transfer of
Venezuelan oil to U.S. refineries by ship represents a
much shorter journey, and, therefore, much cheaper than bringing it from Arab countries.
On the other hand,
oil experts have explained that a significant number of
North American refineries developed their technology to work with
Venezuelan oil, whose characteristics are not the same as those of oil
extracted from other parts of the world, so they would have to make a large
investment to modify their technology if they decided to work with another oil.
All of this makes Venezuela a key player for US geopolitical interests. The escalation
has become evident in recent weeks, following incidents such as attacks on
vessels allegedly linked to drug trafficking in the Caribbean,
operations that, according to the White House, were carried out in self-defense.
However, the Venezuelan government has denounced these actions as military aggression and
a violation of its sovereignty. The ambiguity of the US
administration, by not providing precise details about the
incidents and maintaining a strong naval presence off the
Venezuelan coast, has helped to create a climate of tension.
Analysis such as that of Franklin
Mora, a former official of the US Department of Defense, in an interview
conducted by CNN in Spanish, considered that military deployment
in the Caribbean is not enough for a full-scale invasion, but rather that
it is a “psychological operation that seeks to intimidate and encourage the
military to remove Maduro from power.” In his opinion, the United States
could be seeking surgical operations to destroy
clandestine tracks used by drug trafficking.
The tense relationship between the United States
and Venezuela has entered a new phase, characterized by an intense
campaign of psychological pressure that seeks to destabilize the government of Nicolás Maduro.
Beyond traditional economic sanctions and support for
the opposition, Washington has deployed a strategy of intimidation
based on threatening messages, military deployment in the region and
selective actions that seek to generate uncertainty and mistrust within the Venezuelan people.
This “war of nerves”, as
described by the Secretary General of the United Socialist Party of Venezuela
(PSUV), Diosdado Cabello Rondón, “is based on lies, manipulations and fake
news, seeking to divide the internal forces of Chavism led by the US Secretary of State, Marco Rubio
, who seems to have
assumed a central role in Washington's policy towards Venezuela,
calling President Nicolás Maduro a “criminal” and a “fugitive”
from American justice”.
Faced with this growing pressure, the Venezuelan
government has responded by displaying its military strength and mobilizing the civilian population.
Maduro has been accompanying the people in the midst of military
formations, while his defense minister, Vladimir Padrino,
has announced the deployment of troops to the country's main borders. This
deployment includes the mobilization of more than 8 million militiamen, ordinary
citizens who receive basic military training. The government has
also denounced an increase in US spy flights
over Venezuelan territory, intensifying anti-imperialist rhetoric and
accusing Washington of preparing military aggression.
Faced with this climate of tension, the international community notes with concern the deterioration of diplomatic
relations due to the campaign of psychological pressure led
by the United States, which, although they seek to destabilize the
Bolivarian Revolution, continue to bet on diplomacy and dialogue, which will always be the only ways to overcome this crisis and build a future
of peace and stability for the Venezuelan people.
AMELYREN BASABE/Mazo News Team