Farce of the “acts” of opposition extremism: Deaths, lack of data, forging of figures and flat signatures

Machado and González Urrutia have promoted the largest known attempt at electoral fraud in Venezuelan electoral history.
Internet

Published at: 02/08/2024 09:40 PM

This Friday, the head of the Venezuela Nuestra Campaign Command, Jorge Rodríguez, unveiled the lie that opposition extremism tried to weave around the Venezuelan electoral process with the use of “records” that do not correspond to reality and that are clearly the product of the forging of those who seek to deceive Venezuelans and the world.

After explaining the elements contained in the legal act that issues the voting machine set up by the National Electoral Council (CNE), Rodríguez proceeded to highlight the absence of elements and repetition of patterns contained in the alleged acts published on a website by opposition extremism.

Absence of key and distinctive elements

The “minutes” presented on the website created by opposition extremism to try to replace the CNE and falsify the results in its favor are mostly:

  • Absence of machine operator data.
  • Absence of data from table witnesses.
  • Absence of the data of the board members.

These are key elements to ensure that the report submitted is the one issued by the machine set up for the voting station.


Forging “zero records”

In addition, the head of the Venezuela Nuestra Campaign Command explained that before starting the voting process, the president of the table, in the presence of party witnesses, proceeds to print the so-called “zero record” to show that all candidates have zero votes.

This act has been forged by placing votes to the candidates where the favored candidate is the imperialist candidate Inmundo González.


The essential flat signatures

In addition to the inconsistencies mentioned above, opposition extremism refers to the old strategy of flat signatures used during the collection of wills to activate the 2004 referendum that Commander President Hugo Chávez won overwhelmingly, and which was intended to be used to activate a referendum against President Nicolás Maduro in 2016, but which has been the constant of every “primary election” or “citizen consultation” organized by Súmate under the orders of María Machado.

On this occasion, the president of the board, secretary, members and witnesses of most of the “acts” of opposition extremism have a similar or very similar rubric, which is unlikely given that the spelling of each person differs in many ways.

Deceased suffrage

To all these obvious deficiencies, which already show the falsehood of the papers presented by opposition extremism as “acts”, is added the return to an old practice of the Fourth Republic of increasing results through the use of deceased as voters.

And the evidence presented by Rodríguez using the identity of a well-known journalist murdered by assassins in the service of opposition extremism in January 2016 confirms the growing allegations surrounding the use of dead people and the theft of identity of people who did not vote to increase the votes of Inmundo, who will remain with Machado, as the greatest fraudsters ever known in Venezuelan politics.


Mazo News Team

Share this news: